- Jan 24, 2024
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5221
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
I noticed a typo in the configuration key.
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
The dynamic instance and not the soon-to-be decommissionned static instance. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
It was not at the right location. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
This is to be run exclusively on saam due to the access to the pathslicing mounted there. This enhances the actual template to be able to provide specific node selector and specific volume mountpoints to add to the main container. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5215
-
Vincent Sellier authored
-
-
-
-
-
- Jan 23, 2024
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Once deployed, we'll progressively make the existing clients use that instance. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Either global to the deployment or per instance. And then declare explicitely one for running the intance on saam only (for the zfs pathslicing access). Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
And declare explicitely one for the saam-zfs instance. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
This instance will be deployed on the saam host to continue using the /srv/softwareheritage/objects filesystem mountpoints. Specific affinity labels will be installed on that node to ensure the instance only runs there. The name of the service & ingress are explicit to avoid name conflict ambiguity on the various read-write services we have. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5214
-
- Jan 22, 2024
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
According to existing documentation. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5110
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
The production workers now requires the swh.graph.http_client module. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5211
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Activate it in production to match the previous production cooker's configuration. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5211
-
Vincent Sellier authored
-
- Jan 20, 2024
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
The 2 pods are not enough to reply to the current load, mostly vault cooker. The pods restarts regularly due to the unresponding probes.
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
- Jan 19, 2024
-
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
As per the documentation already allows it for the reading part. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5110
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
(spurious push of a tagged swh-charts version)
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5110
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Except we had 2 nodes, search1 and search on moma. Each 4 workers (1 thread). The resources change is done according to the current use we have. Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5110
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
The indexer storage sentry reports were effectively disabled, as the secret is not mandatory and the -storage- key was missing
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
Ref. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5200
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
For the indexers which work much better with lower latency storage
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
Should fix sentry issue SWH-VAULT-6E
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Refs. swh/infra/sysadm-environment#5183
-