- Jun 08, 2021
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T3350
-
- Jun 02, 2021
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
The first iteration went wrong (not exactly clear what). Nonetheless, the node got decomissioned in the master and the node got removed and created back after that. Now everyting is fine.
-
- Jun 01, 2021
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T3350
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
-
- Apr 22, 2021
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T3283
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Avoid to override the specific configuration of journal for cloudinit
-
- Apr 21, 2021
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T3242
-
- Mar 25, 2021
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T3175
-
- Mar 22, 2021
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T3159
-
- Feb 10, 2021
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
The end goal is to replicate our current production environment. And making sure writing to the journal with more than 1 indexer behave properly. terraform apply summary: ``` worker3_summary = hostname: worker3 fqdn: worker3.internal.staging.swh.network network: ip=192.168.130.103/24,gw=192.168.130.1 macaddrs=1A:F8:1A:2C:12:E1 ``` Related to T2780
-
- Jan 27, 2021
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
It will allow to manually start several instances of the swh-search-journal-client
-
- Jan 08, 2021
-
-
Nicolas Dandrimont authored
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T2935
-
- Jan 07, 2021
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T2827
-
- Jan 06, 2021
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T2905
-
- Dec 23, 2020
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T2905
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T2905
-
Vincent Sellier authored
-
- Dec 22, 2020
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T2827
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T2827
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
This inlines the production/common.tf within the production/production.tf
-
- Dec 21, 2020
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
terraform apply output: ``` objstorage0_summary = hostname: objstorage0 fqdn: objstorage0.internal.staging.swh.network network: ip=192.168.130.110/24,gw=192.168.130.1 macaddrs=5E:28:EA:7D:50:0D ``` Related to T2682
-
- Dec 17, 2020
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Superior version will need some upgrade on terraform.tfstate file. So right now, pin the version to 13.5.
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
This matches what's currently done for the staging area.
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T2888
-
- Dec 16, 2020
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
terraform apply output: ``` clearly-defined_summary = hostname: clearly-defined fqdn: clearly-defined.internal.staging.swh.network network: ip=192.168.130.200/24,gw=192.168.130.1 macaddrs=B6:C6:2E:D3:60:B2 ``` Related to T2865
-
- Dec 10, 2020
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
- disk: to be able to retrieve the origin production index - memory: to lower the pression on the gc during mass import and add more fs cache for the searches - cpu: to have more threads on the ES thread pools (with the default configuration). The cpu was the bottleneck during mass import and it leads to OOMs eventually Related to T2817
-
- Dec 08, 2020
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
`terraform apply` result: ``` search0_summary = hostname: search0 fqdn: search0.internal.staging.swh.network network: ip=192.168.130.90/24,gw=192.168.130.1 macaddrs=EE:FA:76:55:CF:99 ``` Related to T2817
-
- Dec 04, 2020
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
This also modifies the ballooning to 9Gib because the heap is configured to be half the memory of the machine (16Gib). With a ballooning starting at 1Gib, elasticsearch refuses to start. Related to T2817
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Output: ``` search-esnode0_summary = hostname: search-esnode0 fqdn: search-esnode0.internal.staging.swh.network network: ip=192.168.130.80/24,gw=192.168.130.1 macaddrs=96:74:49:BD:B5:08 ``` Related to T2817
-
- Nov 26, 2020
-
-
Vincent Sellier authored
-
Vincent Sellier authored
Related to T2790
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
They were decomissioned alongside orsay
-
- Nov 06, 2020
-
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T2747
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Somehow, it stopped working. Only seen recently as we needed to create back a new machine. Related to T2747
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
They used to be installed in the template. We now inline those directly prior to the puppet step run. Related to T2747
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
Related to T2747
-
Antoine R. Dumont authored
-