Skip to content

tox: Adapt configuration to make the coverage report work

Antoine R. Dumont requested to merge generated-differential-D634-source into generated-differential-D634-target

Discussion:

16:27 <+zack> ardumont: is this 0% coverage a false positive? https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/view/swh%20master/job/DDEP/job/tests/7/cobertura/
16:27 <+zack> because there are tests in swh-deposit
16:44 <+anlambert> ardumont: got the same tests coverage issue with swh-web, if you adapt your tox.ini in the same way as in https://forge.softwareheritage.org/source/swh-web/browse/master/tox.ini, coverage report will work
16:48 <+ardumont> zack: yes, it's a false positive (i expect a much higher coverage ;)
16:48 <+ardumont> anlambert: thx for the heads up
16:53 <+ardumont> anlambert: zack: indeed, now it says 82% (locally)
16:53 <+ardumont> (through tox)
16:55 <+anlambert> \o/

Test Plan

tox

Migrated from D634 (view on Phabricator)

Merge request reports