Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • S swh-web
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 84
    • Issues 84
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 7
    • Merge requests 7
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Platform
  • Development
  • swh-web
  • Issues
  • #1870
Closed
Open
Issue created Jul 01, 2019 by Stefano Zacchiroli@zackMaintainer

revamp archive coverage page to list instances of mentioned listers

Now that we are increasing archive coverage quite a bit, the archive coverage page is starting to show some limits. In particular, we need a structured way to list the various instances of supported listers.

  • as a first approximation we can make the tooltip of each listed logo include a list of instances — this would work for now, but it won't scale for much, because there is only so much usable space in a tooltip
  • alternatively we can make each logo link to a dedicated //page//, where we list all deployed instances of the lister (which will probably mean solve #1266 as a prerequisite)
  • alternatively, don't know, a way in between maybe? e.g. a box that opens when clicking on each logo, with a proper
    with links to each instance?

    A proper solution (#1266) would require some work, but the current state is no longer good enough in terms of clarity of what we currently archive… Thoughts?


    Migrated from T1870 (view on Phabricator)

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking