Project 'infra/sysadm-environment' was moved to 'swh/infra/sysadm-environment'. Please update any links and bookmarks that may still have the old path.
marked this issue as related to swh/devel/swh-storage#381 (closed)
changed the description
Note that there are at least 2 separate sub-tasks here, with potentially different priorities:
I'm not sure if the archiver @qcampos is developing uses objstorage for both read and write. If so, both tasks are at the same priority; if not depoying on banco (for the write end of the archival) is more urgent.
! In #405 (closed), @zack wrote: I'm not sure if the archiver @qcampos is developing uses objstorage for both read and write. If so, both tasks are at the same priority; if not depoying on banco (for the write end of the archival) is more urgent.
The archiver uses objstorage
only for writing, and storage
for reading.
However, it could be replaced by only an objstorage
+ database for reading as well, and may possibly be an improvement as the storage
is an unnecessary intermediate layer.
Ready to be deployed on banco.
added priority:High label and removed priority:Normal label
closed